Waikato Coastal Database

Hauraki Catchment Board Files – Whangapoua/Matarangi

1. Identification information

Status
Complete
Data Collection Date
Summary
The Hauraki Catchment Board was established under the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 (and amendments). This Act was labelled ‘An Act to make provision for the conservation of soil resources and for the prevention of damage by erosion, and to make better provision with respect to the protection of property from damage by floods’. The first Catchment Boards were set up in 1943 and the Hauraki Catchment Board was established in 1947. The Board consisted of a maximum of 16 members, several governmental representatives from the: Ministry of Works and Development, Department of Lands and Survey, N. Z. Forest Service (after 1961), Department of Agriculture, and the majority of whom were elected from the local community. After 1958 the Farm Advisory Officers of the Department of Agriculture were transferred to the Ministry of Works and Development. Under the 1941 Act, Catchment Authorities were made responsible for flood control, drainage, soil conservation and controlling erosion. The administrative boundaries were generally catchment boundaries so that the Catchment Board's boundaries usually did not coincide with the Local County boundaries. Counties could also opt out of a Board's control, as in Coromandel where north of the Tararu and Tairua River Catchments the Act was administered by the Ministry of Works. The Water and Soil Conservation Act 1967 (and amendments), gave Catchment Authorities the dual role of regional water boards. As a result they became responsible for administering the water resources of the region. This involved the issuing of water rights for the take and discharge of water and the drawing up of water allocation plans for various users. The reform of the LA’s led to the formation of Regional Councils and as a consequence of this reform many Catchment Boards were amalgamated into wider regions where the political boundaries as opposed to catchment boundaries were used to define regions. The Hauraki Catchment Board was thus amalgamated into the Waikato Region, as was the northern part of the Coromandel Peninsula. Early file records for the northern part of the Coromandel Peninsula are contained in the files of Coromandel County and Ministry of Works Auckland (files cover the early part of the period) and later Hamilton. The file records for the southern part of the Coromandel Peninsula, south of Tararu and Tairua south to Waihi, are to be found in the Thames County records and also the Hauraki Catchment Board files. The early coastal records often refer to wharf structures, construction and maintenance as there was initially little roading present. However, with the development of roads in this area the beaches became a ready source of roading aggregate, particularly the shingle beaches of the Coromandel west coast. In 1922, a survey of the condition of the beaches used for shingle extraction indicated that many were over exploited. This resulted in a recommendation that the Marine Department close all beaches for extraction, south of a line between Long Bay (Auckland) and the Colville Channel. This effectively closed the Coromandel west coast beaches to sand extraction. The removal of sand and shingle for local use, particularly roading, continued around the Peninsula into the 1980s. Some sand was taken from the mouth of Whangapoua Harbour by dredging the ebb tide bar. This material was sold in Auckland. Similarly, sand was removed from the Maori Land block at the South end of Whiritoa Beach with the consent of the Maori Trustee. This material was also sold in Auckland. The majority of the Hauraki Catchment Board file notes centre around the problems with coastal development. Levelling dunes to create building sites was one problem, but the more controversial aspect was the width of the building set back from the high water mark (HWM). In 1984 the Hauraki Board came up with some guidelines for future developments which were superseded in a report by Environment Waikato (2002). Purpose: See data set abstract below
Content
• 1/22/0 Shingle from water courses. Volume 2. Report starts February 1957. Associated files: Lands and Survey file 3/686 Hamilton district Office. The land settlement Board was working a license to extract shingle, however it was not specified where they would be doing the extraction. SC, RCC and L&S issued a circular in 1956/7 on the control of shingle extraction in rivers; 1. In tidal rivers or where tidal action occurs it was owned by the Crown and controlled by the Marine dept, 2. Navigable rivers (as defined in s206 of the Coal Mines Act 1925) owned by the Crown and administered by L&S, 3. Non-navigable waterways where there are fishing or road reserves owned by Crown and administered by L&S, 4. On all other water courses the shingle is owned by the adjoining landowner. • 1/22/0 Shingle from water courses. Volume 3. Report starts October 1971. NWASCO (file 72/2/1/11) produced draft guidelines for shingle extraction from New Zealand rivers and coasts. Many of the small streams in the Matamata - Piako area were mined for race metal for local farms in the late 1970’s and 1980’s. • 1/22/0 Shingle from water courses. Volume 4. Report starts April 1978. The file commences with a report on sand mining in the Coromandel Peninsula (Works file 47/16) stating that the HCB is to phase out mining in any area suspected of being a closed system or where there is insufficient information about the resource. There are a series of applications to mine sand from the entrance of Whangamata Harbour, Tairua Harbour, Whitianga Harbour and the Katikati entrance to Tauranga Harbour. March 1979. The Board opposed the application for sand removal from Kuaotunu Beach on the grounds that not enough was known about the resource and the supply of new material. • 1/22/0 Shingle from water courses. Volume 6. Report starts July 1982. From late 1982 through to 1984 the Board were conducting a sand and shingle resource assessment for the whole of their region. A table of material used and the source for the previous two years is included in the report. It was noted that there had been a number of “one off” extractions approved in connection with bridge construction around the Peninsula. There is a draft copy of the Sand and Gravel Report. • 1/22/0 Shingle from water courses. Volume 7. Report starts December 1984. The following sand mining applications were received by MOT to take sand from Great Barrier Island: 1. Whangapoua Beach 2,500 m3 to March 1987 (G.B.I. not Coromandel) 2. Whangapoua Beach 10,000 m3 for 1987-88 year 3. Kaitoke Beach 10,000 m3 from for the same period The outcome of these applications in not contained in the file. • 2/11/0 Eastern Catchments. Parts of Thames and Ohinemuri Counties. Volume 3. Report period January 1974 to August 1975. In July an article in the Thames Star states that the Council was unable to do anything about the bulldozing of dunes at Matarangi because private ownership was to the high water mark. • 2/11/0 Eastern Catchments: Parts Thames and Ohinemuri Counties. Report period 1963–1971. The flood of 8th March 1962 was the second or third highest flood in the previous 26–30 years. Largest flood was that of Jan-Feb 1936.
Study Types
  • Literature Review
Categories
  • Coastal Hazards
  • Coastal Development and Public Spaces
  • Sediments
  • Shoreline Change
  • Bathymetry
  • Consents and Structures

2. Contact information

Commissioning Agencies
  • Environment Waikato
Contact Organisations
  • Environment Waikato

3. Spatial information

Geographic Coverage
Whangapoua and Matarangi Beaches and Whangapoua Harbour
Grid Coordinates
Locations
  • Name
    NZMG Easting
    0
    NZMG Northing
    0
    Location
    Kuaotunu Peninsula (incudes Matarangi, Rings, Kuaotunu, Otama and Opito Beaches)
    East Coast
  • Name
    NZMG Easting
    0
    NZMG Northing
    0
    Location
    Whangapoua Harbour
    East Coast
  • Name
    NZMG Easting
    0
    NZMG Northing
    0
    Location
    Kennedy Bay to Whangapoua Estuary
    East Coast

4. Data acquisition information

Collection Date
1957 - 1982
Methodology
Frequency of collection: Irregular

5. Data quality information

Known Limitations
Quality variable Gaps in collection: Some gaps in data collection Data quality: Quality variable

6. Distribution information

Format
Hard copy written files
Applications
Availability
This data is publicly available in TCDC archives. Sensitivity/Confidentiality: No confidentiality – public information.

7. Status information

Data Status
Files closed

8. Metadata information

General Notes
Related Links
Publications
Related Publications
Related Datasets

9. Related files

No files have been attached to this dataset

Back to Top